Canon powershot g1 x mark ii vs mark iii3/15/2024 ![]() ![]() And occasionally, even in good light, the lens would ratchet a little before locking, which would result in missed shots.įocusing and shooting in dim light is exceptionally slow, at 1.3 seconds. Time to focus and shoot in good light runs just under 0.8-second that's really slow, given that most of the competition is at 0.4-second or better. It takes almost 1.6 seconds to power on, focus, and shoot, which is actually on the fast side for enthusiast-compact cameras - they tend to be a sluggish bunch overall. I don't have direct comparison numbers for the G1 X (that was tested using older methodology), but I can say generally that it's slower in some aspects - notably shot lag - but faster at shot-to-shot and continuous-shooting performance. The lens may have a fast aperture, but it doesn't move that quickly, and I occasionally missed shots waiting for the autofocus to lock. (ISO 800) Lori Grunin/CNETīy the time I got to the lab testing, I knew the G1XM2 was slow - and the testing confirmed my gut feeling. ![]() Canon's noise processing leaves yellow splotches in patterned areas like these in midrange ISO sensitivity images. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |